Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Associated Press: How David Cook Won "American Idol'
David Cook > David Cook > David Cook News / Articles
amm11383
How David Cook won 'American Idol'

By DERRIK J. LANG – 3 hours ago

LOS ANGELES (AP) — David Cook's transformation from soul-patched slacker to "American Idol" is complete, and his overwhelming victory probably says as much about his soulful gaze and in-season makeover as it does about his chops as a rocker.
Or maybe it says even more about who's voting these days.
Other than his hair — both on his face and atop his head — not much about the 25-year-old from Blue Springs, Mo., changed since his performance of Bryan Adams' "Everything I Do" during the Hollywood round. Back then, he was a promising "Idol" hopeful, but he didn't have the instant juggernaut feel of 17-year-old crooner David Archuleta.
And yet when Cook was crowned "Idol" on Wednesday night, it was a landslide: Host Ryan Seacreast said he'd won by a margin of 12 million votes out of the record 97.5 million cast by viewers.
"I actually walked into this with no expectations, and I'm walking out of it with no expectations," Cook told reporters backstage after his win. "This show is a springboard, but it's still a crapshoot."
From the outset, the ex-bartender provided soaring vocals and just enough outside-the-box behavior — see his rendition of Chris Cornell's version of Michael Jackson's "Billie Jean" — to keep viewers cooking up votes for Cook every week. Neither Cook nor Archuleta was ever a low vote-getter.
But it was Archuleta who always received the most praise — by both judges and loud fans — right up until Tuesday's final performance, in which judge Simon Cowell declared that Archuleta had scored a "knockout" over Cook, who sang Collective Soul's "The World I Know," U2's "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For" and "Dream Big."
Or maybe being rebellious turned out to be worth the gamble for Cook; it's been suggested that a poor showing with the judges can drum up support from indignant or sympathetic voters.
Criticism may have made Cook's win sweeter for some, but don't call it an upset. Several online outfits predicted he would take home the top prize: a record contract and an SUV. DialIdol.com, which tracks busy signals on the separate phone lines dedicated to each contestant, correctly projected him the winner Wednesday morning.
So why did the older David best the younger one — the one who couldn't take a step on the "Idol" stage without a collective shriek coming up from every under-13-year-old girl in the audience?
One reason for Cook's winning appeal may be found in a rustling in the show's recent ratings: Viewership for teenagers 12-to-17 for "Idol" was down this season, and the median age of an "Idol" viewer, once in the mid-30s, is now up to 42, according to Nielsen Media Research.
Cook was, after all, the first "rocker" of many to take the crown from a steady stream of pop- and R&B-type singers. Perhaps an older contingent helped push Cook over — way over — the edge. The upper age limit was raised from 24 to 28 in season four; could another increase be on the way?
Another reason could be that Cook was so genuinely humble — and not as quiet or obsequious as Archuleta — throughout the competition, even until the very end. On Wednesday, he told reporters it was an honor to share the stage with the teenage singer from Murray, Utah. Cook said Archuleta had more talent at 17 "than I know what to do with at 25."
Cook was overcome with emotion when he won, bending down toward the stage, his eyes filled with tears when he stood back up. It was the second time in as many nights that the scruffy, grainy-voiced belter had broken down. And a few weeks earlier, when he seemed edgy and distracted, he acknowledged that he had "things going on," perhaps a vague reference to the struggles of his older brother, Adam, who is battling advanced brain cancer.
On Wednesday night, Cowell saw fit to apologize to Cook for casting him as an also-ran to Archuleta. Just before the winner was announced, Cowell uncharacteristically backtracked on his words of the night before, telling him he was one of the nicest and most genuine contestants the show has seen, and allowing that the competition "wasn't quite so clear cut as we called it."
Beyond his booming voice and continuous acclaim, Archuleta became the focus of controversy when his father, Jeff, was reportedly becoming too heavily involved in his son's rehearsals and asked by the show's producers to back off. News of such an altercation may have cost the doe-eyed crooner votes from a more knowing adult audience, who perhaps couldn't stomach the thought of rewarding a stage dad.
The only behind-the-scenes story about Cook to surface during the competition concerned his sick older brother, who made the trek to Los Angeles from Indiana to watch his brother perform as a member of the top seven finalists. Such adversity can only make someone on TV seem more human.
Whatever the reasons really were this year, in a competition that can crown a 29-year-old gray-haired Southerner one year and a cheery 17-year-old high-school student from Arizona the next, it's ultimately impossible to tell why America choose its "Idol" the way it does.
annie702
I'll tell you how he won. Check out the Dial Idol graph with the "hard analysis of real-time data": http://www.dialidol.com/asp/predictions/DIHardGraphs.asp

Note that the score was equal for both guys during the first stretch, peaking at about 15 minutes post-show. Some of the data shows that Archuleta had a slight advantage at this point. Then the call volume starts to fall for both guys. This is expected as those were the swing votes...the ones that vote for the first 15 minutes and stop once they get through a couple of times, usually based on that night's performance alone (which the judges had called for Archuleta, having a stellar night).

Now, note that at this point Cook's dial idol score falls at a much slower rate with time than Archuleta's. Then, a little past midnight they both have an uptick and then the scores fall at an even slower rate. THAT is what wins the competition...extremely loyal voters the contestant has won over--those people willing to keep vigil for you. You don't win that loyalty on one night...it takes weeks of giving it your all. Cook won more loyal voters than Archuleta...or you may call us obsessive-compulsive voters wink.gif.

To paraphrase Chikeze: If you're just tuning in Archuleta won, but if you've been paying attention all season Cook won.
Cobbler
QUOTE (annie702 @ May 22 2008, 08:26 AM) *
I'll tell you how he won.

... THAT is what wins the competition...extremely loyal voters the contestant has won over--those people willing to keep vigil for you. You don't win that loyalty on one night...it takes weeks of giving it your all. Cook won more loyal voters than Archuleta...or you may call us obsessive-compulsive voters wink.gif.

To paraphrase Chikeze: If you're just tuning in Archuleta won, but if you've been paying attention all season Cook won.


Word (nerd) wink.gif
Lynn19
Yes, Word Nerd #551 here and proud of it!!
amor825
QUOTE (annie702 @ May 22 2008, 08:26 AM) *
I'll tell you how he won. Check out the Dial Idol graph with the "hard analysis of real-time data": http://www.dialidol.com/asp/predictions/DIHardGraphs.asp

Note that the score was equal for both guys during the first stretch, peaking at about 15 minutes post-show. Some of the data shows that Archuleta had a slight advantage at this point. Then the call volume starts to fall for both guys. This is expected as those were the swing votes...the ones that vote for the first 15 minutes and stop once they get through a couple of times, usually based on that night's performance alone (which the judges had called for Archuleta, having a stellar night).

Now, note that at this point Cook's dial idol score falls at a much slower rate with time than Archuleta's. Then, a little past midnight they both have an uptick and then the scores fall at an even slower rate. THAT is what wins the competition...extremely loyal voters the contestant has won over--those people willing to keep vigil for you. You don't win that loyalty on one night...it takes weeks of giving it your all. Cook won more loyal voters than Archuleta...or you may call us obsessive-compulsive voters wink.gif.

To paraphrase Chikeze: If you're just tuning in Archuleta won, but if you've been paying attention all season Cook won.


You're so wise. I agree with you. DCs's fans stayed thru the night. That's loyalty. For us here in the PH, it was daytime during the voting, so many skipped school and office so that they can vote. Am so glad that it was all worth it.
LavenderBlue
I'm so glad I dialed till my thumbs spasmed with pain, ignored the hunger pangs that set in around midnight, totally disregarded my body's need to urinate, and even forced my husband to vote on another phone. Four hours of non-stop voting with 3 phones!!! It was all worth it! David Cook is the new American Idol!!!!!!!!!!!! rolleyes.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.