Table of Contents
Does virtue epistemology solve the Gettier problem?
The VE solution to the Gettier problem is that knowledge requires you to believe the truth “because of” your intellectual virtues, but Gettier subjects do not believe the truth because of their virtues, so they do not know (Zagzebski 1996: 285 ff; Greco 2003; Sosa 2007: ch.
What is virtue epistemology theory?
Virtue epistemology is a collection of recent approaches to epistemology that give epistemic or intellectual virtue concepts an important and fundamental role.
How does zagzebski solve the Gettier problem?
Zagzebski asserts that any analysis of knowledge that is predicated on the notion, that knowledge must have its grounds in true belief plus another component -for instance, justification or warrants- are subject to Gettier problems. Justification, for example, doesn’t necessitate truth.
What is knowledge Linda zagzebski?
Linda Zagzebski defines knowledge as: “Knowledge is a state of true belief arising out of acts of intellectual virtue.” (Zagzebski, 1996, 271).
What does virtue knowledge mean?
Socrates paradoxical statement, “virtue is knowledge” claimed that no one does wrong willingly, it is better to be wronged then to do wrong.
What was Gettier’s argument?
Gettier argues that if an agent is justified in believing (g), even though (g) is actually false, then that agent is justified in deducing (h) from (g) and therefore believing that (h). Under such circumstances, (h) is false, because it depends upon (g), which is false.
What is Infallibilism in epistemology?
Infallibilism is the epistemological view that propositional knowledge is incompatible with the possibility of being wrong.
What is virtue knowledge Plato?
Description: In early Plato, Socrates advances two theses regarding virtue. He suggests that virtue is a kind of knowledge, similar to the expertise involved in a craft; and he suggests that the five virtues (wisdom, temperance, courage, justice and piety) form a unity.
What is virtue based on Socrates?
Based upon first-hand knowledge of the Greek texts, my thesis is as follows: man’s virtue, according to Socrates, is wisdom (skill or knowledge-how) to act effectively or correctly in a given situ- ation, grounded in and based upon absolutely certain knowledge (intellec- tual knowledge-that) .
What is Aristotle’s intellectual virtue?
According to Aristotle, the intellectual virtues include: scientific knowledge (episteme), artistic or technical knowledge (techne), intuitive reason (nous), practical wisdom (phronesis), and philosophic wisdom (sophia). Scientific knowledge is a knowledge of what is necessary and universal.
Can the gettier problem be solved?
Solutions to the Gettier problem can take two forms. First, they can attempt to show that Gettier-type examples fail as counterexamples, and that JTB therefore emerges unscathed. The literature is replete with this kind of counter-counterexample, and such arguments are usually met with counter-counter-counterexamples.
Is virtue epistemology uniquely suited to solve the value problem?
Many virtue epistemologists think that their approach is uniquely suited to provide satisfying answers to these questions. Zagzebski (2003) argues that an adequate account of knowledge must explain why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief. This is known as “the value problem”.
What is the best book on epistemic virtue?
Fairweather, Abrol and Linda Zagzebski (eds.), 2001, Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Greco, John (ed.), 2004, Ernest Sosa and his Critics , Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Why theorize intellectual virtues via Epistemic Emotions?
One benefit of theorizing intellectual virtues via epistemic emotions is that doing so furnishes practitioners with a sort of “to do list”: many of the virtues related to the emotions mentioned in the previous paragraph are unexplored or underexplored. These virtues are ripe for the picking.
How should epistemology inspire us?
Perhaps epistemology should inspire us with portraits of intellectual virtues, thereby promoting cultural reformation and intellectual flourishing (Roberts & Wood 2007). Perhaps epistemology should examine intellectual vices and other defects to tell cautionary tales of what not to do and how not to be (Alfano 2015, Battaly 2014, Cassam 2016).